Solurana InsightsExam strategyJune 19, 2026

Where to spend your hours: a study-time allocation for CFA Level I

Time is your scarce resource, not knowledge. Here is where to overweight it, and where to bank the quick wins.

Our framework
The principle: start from each topic's exam weight, then tilt. Overweight where the marks are hard to win (more hours per mark), and underweight where they are easy (quick to capture).
The output: an overweight / equal-weight / underweight rating per topic — your study time set against each topic's exam weight, then tilted by difficulty (equal-weight = hours in line with the topic's weight).
The discipline: treat study time like a portfolio — concentrate it where the expected marks per hour are highest.

The allocation map

TopicExam weightDifficultyStudy allocation
Financial Statement Analysis (FRA)11–14%HighOverweight
Ethics15–20%MediumOverweight
Fixed Income11–14%HighOverweight
Quantitative Methods6–9%HighOverweight
Equity Investments11–14%MediumEqual-weight
Economics6–9%MediumEqual-weight
Derivatives5–8%MediumEqual-weight
Portfolio Management8–12%LowEqual-weight
Alternative Investments7–10%LowUnderweight
Corporate Issuers6–9%LowUnderweight

Exam weights are the official 2026 ranges; difficulty is the Solurana Difficulty Index; the rating tilts time relative to a topic's raw weight, toward the hard topics and away from the easy ones.

How to read it

Overweight — FRA, Ethics, Fixed Income, Quant. Spend more time than the raw weight suggests: this is where the marks are hardest to win, and hardest to win back if you skimp. FRA and Ethics together are between a quarter and a third of the exam and both punish shallow prep; Fixed Income and Quant are calculation-heavy and unforgiving of gaps. Quant is the sleeper: a modest weight but a high difficulty that candidates routinely underestimate.

Equal-weight — Equity, Economics, Derivatives, Portfolio Management. Hours in line with each topic's exam weight. The difficulty is manageable, so hours can track weight. Derivatives is conceptually hard but short; Equity is heavy but builds on familiar valuation logic, so it rewards steady reps over deep grinding; and Portfolio Management is low-difficulty but the heaviest of the easy topics, too weighty to underweight.

Underweight — Alternative Investments, Corporate Issuers. Capture efficiently and move on. Low difficulty and modest weight make these quick wins, not the place to lose a week. Corporate Issuers is the most approachable topic on the exam.

Two cautions

  • These are tilts, not "skip it." Every topic has capturable marks, and taking any to zero is a mistake — Ethics in particular can swing a borderline result through the "Ethics adjustment."
  • Your diagnostic overrides the map. If your FRA is already strong and your Derivatives is lagging, tilt to your own gaps — a generic allocation is a starting point, not a substitute for knowing where you lose marks. (A free 30-question diagnostic will tell you.)

The bottom line

The exam is won by spending hours where they convert to marks. The Difficulty Index says that is disproportionately FRA, Ethics, Fixed Income, and Quant, and much less Corporate Issuers and Alternatives. Allocate accordingly, then let your own results pull the weights around.

Find your focus areas — free diagnostic See the Difficulty Index →

Start studying free
upgrade only when you are ready
Start free